Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:04

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
How do you know when someone really loves you?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What measures can companies take to overcome the global talent shortage in IT outsourcing?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Scoop: Nike names Michael Gonda as chief communications officer - Axios
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Mets to call up Max Kranick to take Kodai Senga's roster spot - SNY
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.